judicialpowerproject.org.uk

GENERAL
META
HTML
LINK ANALYSIS
SERVER
IP

Judicialpowerproject.org.uk receives any estimated 354 unique visitors and 61 unique page views per day. Revenue gained from these much visits may be $0 per day from various advertising sources. The estimated worth of site is $87. Similarweb global rank is 7,899,993. Maximum no. of users comes from .

Enix Ltd is ISP, hosted on IP 91.238.164.177 in Country United Kingdom.

Website Age n/a
Alexa Rank no-data
Country United Kingdom
IP Address 91.238.164.177

META INFORMATION

Title

Judicial Power Project | Examining the proper limits of judicial power

Description

Keywords

Content Type

utf-8

No	Meta Name	Value
1	viewport	width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=1.0, user-scalable=0

GENERAL HTML INFORMATION

Type	Status
HTML 5
Responsive Website

HTML SIZE INFORMATION

Text / Code Ratio 11.33 %

judicialpowerproject.org.uk has a website text/code ratio of 11.33 %. Search engine crawlers tend to not pick up pages with inadequate content.

IMPORTANT HTML TAGS AND COUNTS

Titles

H11
H217
H30
H40
H50
H60

No	Text
1	ın the media

No	Text
1	The unconst**utionality of the supreme court’s prorogation judgment
2	Legislated rights
3	Constutional rights and constutional design
4	Commentary on sir noel malcolm’s “human rights and political wrongs”
5	Does political criticism of judges damage judicial ındependence?
6	Judicial power and the balance of our const**ution
7	Judicial power and the left: notes on a sceptical tradition
8	The supreme court’s misunderstanding in the gerry adams case
9	Mishandling the law
10	The court of appeal’s powerful ‘right to rent’ judgment
11	The echr and the future of northern ıreland’s past
12	Fair trials for terrorists: why the court of appeal was right to reject the view from strasbourg
13	The law of the const**ution before the court
14	Why shamima begum should not have been allowed to return
15	How the supreme court has empowered gerry adams to sue the government – and seek damages
16	Times letters: special advisers and johnson’s grip on power
17	Subscribe for updates on the work of the judicial power project

Text Styling

STRONG1
B0
EM2
I1
U0
CITE0

STRONG

No	Text
1	Contact Us

No	Text
1	Constutional Rights and Constutional Design
2	The Judicial Power Project is brought to you by Policy Exchange

No	Text
1	Miller/Cherry

LINK ANALYSIS

Total Link Count: 90

Internal Link Count : 84

No	Text	Type
1	Home	text
2	About	text
3	About the Project	text
4	People	text
5	Posts	text
6	In the Media	text
7	Series	text
8	Judicial Review and Judicial Independence	text
9	Human Rights and Political Wrongs	text
10	Constutional Rights and Constutional Design	text
11	Legislated Rights	text
12	Debates	text
13	Debating the Supreme Court’s prorogation judgment	text
14	Commentary on Lord Sumption’s Reith Lectures	text
15	Finnis on Judicial Power	text
16	Ekins and Forsyth on Evans	text
17	Varuhas on Judicial Review and Political Accountability	text
18	Brexit and Judicial Power	text
19	ALBA Papers on Judicial Activism	text
20	Lawfare	text
21	Protecting Those Who Serve \| Richard Ekins, Patrick Hennessey and Julie Marionneau	text
22	Clearing the Fog of Law: Saving our armed forces from defeat by judicial diktat	text
23	The Fog of Law: An introduction to the legal erosion of British fighting power	text
24	Publications	text
25	Events	text
26	Legislated Rights	text
27	Read More	text
28	Constutional Rights and Constutional Design	text
29	Read More	text
30	Commentary on Sir Noel Malcolm’s “Human Rights and Political Wrongs”	text
31	recent study	text
32	panel discussion	text
33	Read More	text
34	Does Political Criticism Of Judges Damage Judicial Independence?	text
35	Read More	text
36	Judicial Power and the Balance of Our Const**ution	text
37	Read More	text
38	Judicial Power and the Left: Notes on a Sceptical Tradition	text
39	Read More	text
40	-	image
41	The Supreme Court’s misunderstanding in the Gerry Adams case	text
42	Publications	text
43	read more	text
44	-	image
45	Mishandling the Law	text
46	Publications	text
47	read more	text
48	-	image
49	The Court of Appeal’s powerful ‘right to rent’ judgment	text
50	Posts	text